Why I love my stainless mash tun

American Pale Ale mashI don’t use a cooler mash tun. Unlike the majority of all-grain homebrewers, I mash in my boil kettle. It’s a process that was suggested to me by a former employee of my LHBS in order to save money on start-up equipment, and I’ve never changed.

The downside to doing this is that I do a mash transfer to my Zapap lauter tun after my mash is done. It’s one more step, but since I’ve always done it, it seems normal.

The upsides to having my mash in my boil kettle are many. First of all, it’s one less piece of equipment that I had to buy. Secondly, if I want to do a step-mash, or even just ramp up to a mash-out temperature, I don’t have to boil water and hope that I’ve heated enough to get me to the step I want to hit. I just turn on the burner and stir until I hit the temp I want.

I know that mastering a multi-infusion process would be a good thing to learn, and I’m sure I will someday, but for now, I like my process. It works really well for me, and I’m glad to have it.

Improving Efficiency

My last post alluded to some efficiency problems I’ve been experiencing recently — while I had originally been hitting efficiencies around 75%, the last several batches were down closer to 60%, which resulted in disappointing starting gravities. I got some good feedback, and reverted to some of my old ways, including a pseudo fly-sparge method where I keep the mash covered in water during the sparge by adding water intermittently.

The biggest change that I made was to lauter very very slowly. Painfully slowly. It took close to an hour to lauter runnings for a 9.5lb batch of grains, which is more than double the time I had taken before. While it was somewhat boring, it gave me time to putter around and do some other prep and cleanup.

The result? 93% efficiency from the mash. I was very pleased. Knowing that a slow, really slow lauter and sparge is key to good efficiency should help some of my bigger beers coming up. I’m looking forward to a repeat performance.