<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Big beer in a small space</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mainebrews.com/news/2010/04/big-beer-in-a-small-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mainebrews.com/news/2010/04/big-beer-in-a-small-space/#utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=big-beer-in-a-small-space</link> <description>Home Brewing &#38; Craft Beer in Maine</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Joel Mahaffey</title><link>http://www.mainebrews.com/news/2010/04/big-beer-in-a-small-space/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link> <dc:creator>Joel Mahaffey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:33:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainebrews.com/news/?p=824#comment-318</guid> <description>great advice erik. I&#039;m also going to try returning to my earlier methods or pseudo-fly sparging to see if that helps at all.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great advice erik. I&#8217;m also going to try returning to my earlier methods or pseudo-fly sparging to see if that helps at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: erik</title><link>http://www.mainebrews.com/news/2010/04/big-beer-in-a-small-space/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link> <dc:creator>erik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.mainebrews.com/news/?p=824#comment-317</guid> <description>It is my understanding that you have to go REALLY low in water-to-grain ratio to lose efficiency.  Like, well below the 1qt:1lb ratio.
I don&#039;t do any stirring during my mash - I let it sit, and I often get over 80% efficiency.  I also use water to grain ratios that are somewhere around 1.5qt:1lb (when I have room), so I&#039;m not sure you need to factor stirring space in on the equation.
I do find that the thicker my mash is, the harder time I have getting my beer to be clear at the end, but I can&#039;t tell you, on a science level, why that would be.
Finally - my normal solution for making big beers and fitting it into my mash tun is to make smaller batches.  I normally make 3 gal. batches of my big stuff vs. 5 gal of &quot;normal gravity&quot; beers.  That way I drink them at about the same rate, too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that you have to go REALLY low in water-to-grain ratio to lose efficiency.  Like, well below the 1qt:1lb ratio.</p><p>I don&#8217;t do any stirring during my mash &#8211; I let it sit, and I often get over 80% efficiency.  I also use water to grain ratios that are somewhere around 1.5qt:1lb (when I have room), so I&#8217;m not sure you need to factor stirring space in on the equation.</p><p>I do find that the thicker my mash is, the harder time I have getting my beer to be clear at the end, but I can&#8217;t tell you, on a science level, why that would be.</p><p>Finally &#8211; my normal solution for making big beers and fitting it into my mash tun is to make smaller batches.  I normally make 3 gal. batches of my big stuff vs. 5 gal of &#8220;normal gravity&#8221; beers.  That way I drink them at about the same rate, too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
